"Battered wife entitled to time off work, state justices rule":
Yesterday's edition of The Seattle Post-Intelligencer contained an article
that begins, "A sharply divided state Supreme Court ruled Friday that employers cannot penalize the victims of domestic violence who take time off from work to protect themselves and their children."
And The Seattle Times reported on Saturday that "Washington Supreme Court rules victims' job rights are protected."
Friday's ruling of the Supreme Court of Washington State consisted of an opinion announcing the judgment of the court, an opinion concurring in the judgment, an opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part, and a dissenting opinion.
"Roseville artist prepares for jail after refusing to alter mural":
Today's edition of The Detroit Free Press contains an article
that begins, "Artist Ed (Gonzo) Stross is preparing himself for jail -- a punishment he considers lighter than removing a critical part of his mural, as the state Supreme Court ordered last month."
"The Supreme Court's New Term": This editorial
will appear Monday in The New York Times.
"Parental notification measure might be bulletproof in the courts":
Yesterday in The San Jose Mercury News, Howard Mintz had an article
that begins, "For more than a decade, abortion foes have been trying to erase a bitterly divided California Supreme Court decision that struck down a law requiring minors to get parental consent for abortions. Now, if voters approve Proposition 4 in next month's election, that 1997 ruling will become nothing more than a footnote in the law books. A new parental notification law in California may well be insulated against another legal challenge, given what has unfolded in other states that have passed similar laws and the U.S. Supreme Court's rulings on the issue. In short, if opponents of parental consent laws want to win, it appears likely they will have to win at the ballot box, not in the courts."
"Top court to rule: Does 'rat' have rights?"
Today in The Newark (N.J.) Star-Ledger, Kate Coscarelli has an article
that begins, "He's treated like any other member of the picket line. When Mercer County electrical union workers line up to protest businesses paying nonunion wages, he holds a sign aloft and tries to get the word out to anyone passing by. But nothing his sign says grabs people's attention more than his simple presence. He's The Rat, the union's 10-foot inflatable balloon with beady eyes, pointy claws, chewed-up ears, buckteeth and a festering pink belly."
"Supreme Court's Future Hinges on Who Wins '08 Race; A McCain Triumph May Tilt Balance":
Robert Barnes will have this article
Monday in The Washington Post.
"Seeking to Shift Attention to Judicial Nominees": This article
will appear Monday in The New York Times.
And online at Salon, Law Professor Erwin Chemerinsky on Monday will have an essay entitled "How McCain could tilt the Supreme Court: If elected, McCain might well push the court far to the right -- with dramatic consequences for abortion rights, sexual privacy, diversity in schools and more."
"Drama on the docket as court opens new term":
James Oliphant will have this article
Monday in The Chicago Tribune.
"Supreme Court to decide if Maine smokers can sue; The case, to be heard Monday, will determine if the smokers' suit alleging fraudulent ads about 'low tar' cigarettes can go to trial":
Warren Richey will have this article
Monday in The Christian Science Monitor.
And yesterday's edition of The Bangor Daily News contained an article headlined "Maine cases kick off new high court term; Decisions will affect consumers, unions."
"Supreme Court to tackle cigarette, drug issues; Under review is the authority of state courts in connection with jury awards":
Pete Williams of NBC News provides this report
Nina Totenberg of National Public Radio reports that "Consumer Issues Top Supreme Court's Docket."
James Vicini of Reuters reports that "Court term to hear tobacco, TV dirty words cases."
Ariane de Vogue of ABC News reports that "Election Looms as Supreme Court Starts Term; As Barack Obama and John McCain Race to the White House, the Justices Prepare to Hear Cases on Navy Sonar, Drug Labels and 'Fleeting Expletives.'"
And Agence France-Presse reports that "Tobacco, whales await as US Supreme Court gets back to work."
"This time, Roe vs. Wade really could hang in the balance; The Supreme Court's onetime wide majority in favor of abortion rights has shrunk to one: Justice John Paul Stevens, who is 88; Now the decision's fate may depend on who becomes the next president."
David G. Savage has this article
today in The Los Angeles Times.
"Judiciary Gathers for Red Mass":
Tony Mauro has this post
at "The BLT: The Blog of Legal Times."
And The Associated Press reports that "Justices attend Red Mass before new term."
"High court term begins quietly in campaign season":
Mark Sherman of The Associated Press provides this report