"Inside The Incredibly Shrinking Role Of the Supreme Court. And Why John Roberts Is O.K. With That." This lengthy article
will be the cover story in the October 22, 2007 issue of Time magazine.
That issue also features an interview with Justice Clarence Thomas headlined "'We Realize This Is Not About Us.'"
"Court weighs fairness, secrecy of executions":
The Miami Herald provides this news update
"Judges' opinions off the bench: Can Clarence Thomas attack liberals and still be a fair justice?"
Law Professor Kermit Roosevelt
will have this op-ed
Friday in The Christian Science Monitor.
And today in The Boston Globe, Helgi Walker has an op-ed entitled "Why are the media so angry at Clarence Thomas?"
"Fight over court role in US eavesdropping; President Bush and Democrats battle anew over oversight of government surveillance operations": This article
will appear Friday in The Christian Science Monitor.
"Nacchio appeal detailed in 58 pages; The brief argues there was insufficient evidence and the Denver trial took place in an atmosphere of 'vitriol'":
Yesterday's edition of The Denver Post contained this article
Yesterday's edition of The Rocky Mountain News contained an article headlined "Nacchio appeal claims 'prejudgment, vitriol.'" And today's newspaper reports that "Court unlikely to toss conviction, experts say."
The Wall Street Journal reports today that "Nacchio Appeal Argues Qwest Woes Unforeseeable."
Bloomberg News reports that "Ex-Qwest Chief Nacchio Appeals Conviction, Sentence."
Reuters reports that "Nacchio appeal says trades not based on inside data."
And The Associated Press reports that "Court Documents Reveal Nacchio's Defense."
Via WSJ.com's "Law Blog," you can access the brief for appellant at this link.
"States Still Planning Lethal Injection Executions": This audio segment
(RealPlayer required) appeared on this evening's broadcast of NPR's "All Things Considered
"Telecom Immunity Firing Up Congress' Surveillance Debate":
Lawrence Hurley has this article
today in The Daily Journal of California.
"Anita Hill Asks, Has Workplace Changed?"
The AP provides this report
"U.S. Reviews Gitmo Combatant Hearings":
The Associated Press provides this report
Brian Lamb of C-SPAN interviews Justice Clarence Thomas:
If you missed Sunday evening's broadcast of "Q & A
," you can now access the video here
(RealPlayer required) and the transcript here
. You can also download a podcast mp3 version here
(19.7 MB audio file).
"Judge chastised for vacating assault conviction; 'Deviation from laws of Commonwealth'":
The Boston Globe today contains an article
that begins, "A prominent federal judge issued an angry rebuke yesterday against his counterpart in the state district court, adding another extraordinary twist in the now failed attempts of a repeat convict to sidestep a lengthy prison term under the career criminal statute."
Unanimous three-judge First Circuit panel rejects dormant commerce clause challenge to Maine's decision to allow small wineries to operate partially outside the usual strictures of that State's alcohol control laws:
Senior Circuit Judge Bruce M. Selya
is the author of today's opinion
State of Hawaii, which had participated on appeal as an amicus curiae, can intervene to file petition for rehearing en banc in case holding that individuals can sue under the federal civil rights act to enforce sec. 5(f) of the Hawaiian Admission Act:
You can access today's order of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
at this link
The original three-judge panel's ruling, which I previously covered here, suggested that the losing party might be well-served by seeking rehearing en banc:
A considerable line of precedent in this circuit holds that Native Hawaiians, as beneficiaries of the sec. 5(f) trust, have a right under the Admission Act that is enforceable by sec. 1983. The district court, however, held to the contrary, taking the view that recent Supreme Court cases have so undermined our prior case law that suits like this one may no longer be maintained. After a careful comparison of our prior cases with the
recent Supreme Court sec. 1983 cases on which the district court relied, we cannot agree that there is a conflict sufficient to justify a district court or a three-judge panel of this court disregarding well-established precedent.
However, the losing party did not file for rehearing on the issue, and only the State of Hawaii -- a non-party amicus curiae -- did so, simultaneously moving to intervene as a party to thereby have standing to seek rehearing en banc. Today's order grants that motion and orders Hawaii's rehearing petition filed. This may not be the last that we hear of this case.
The Associated Press is reporting:
Now available online are articles headlined "Tax Evaders Denied Appeals As Fee Unpaid
" and "Court Orders Apology for Insult to Dog
"Thomas Book a Best-Seller Online":
Mark Sherman of The Associated Press has a report
that begins, "By one unscientific measure taken Thursday, Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas was not as popular as Alan Greenspan, but a bit better off than Rosie O'Donnell. Thomas' autobiography, like memoirs by Greenspan and O'Donnell, was among the best-selling books on Amazon.com. The justice's new book also ranked a few places ahead of another book about the court."
Federal Circuit reverses judgment of contempt that Seventh Circuit Judge Richard A. Posner issued while sitting by designation as a trial court judge in a patent infringement matter:
You can access today's Federal Circuit
ruling at this link
In today's mail:
A signed copy of Justice Clarence Thomas's new book, "My Grandfather's Son: A Memoir
A copy of Law Professor Daniel J. Solove's new book, "The Future of Reputation: Gossip, Rumor, and Privacy."
And a copy of "Bench Press: The Collision of Courts, Politics, and the Media," edited by Keith J. Bybee.
"The crux of the district court's argument for Cavera's above-Guidelines sentence is its belief that trafficking firearms in urban environments threatens greater harm than trafficking in less densely populated places."
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
today issued a revised decision
in United States
Today's ruling replaces a decision that the same three-judge panel issued on June 6, 2007. My earlier coverage of that ruling appeared at this link. And the trial court's opinion in support of its above-Guidelines sentence can be accessed here.
"It’s Time For a Big Story on the Supreme Court":
In this post
at WSJ.com's "Law Blog," Peter Lattman previews the cover story of the October 22, 2007 issue of Time magazine.
"State Supreme Court to hear case challenging 49ers pat-down policy":
Today in The San Francisco Chronicle, Bob Egelko has an article
that begins, "The state Supreme Court agreed Wednesday to decide whether the San Francisco 49ers invade their fans' privacy by conducting pat-down searches at the stadium gates, a measure ordered by the National Football League to catch potential terrorists. A state appeals court upheld the searches in a 2-1 ruling in July, saying two fans who challenged the policy had tacitly agreed to be searched when they bought their season tickets. But six of the high court's seven justices voted Wednesday to set the appellate ruling aside and review the case."
My thoughts on why the "consent" approach is intellectually bankrupt can be found in the July 9, 2007 installment of my "On Appeal" column for law.com.
"Lawyers in Citgo trial annoyed by online 'fly'":
The San Antonio Express-News today contains an article
that begins, "A dispute between a South Texas activist-turned-cyber-fly and a giant oil company could reverberate across the World Wide Web, depending on the decision of a federal court in Corpus Christi. Citgo Petroleum Corp. wants a federal judge to order a retrial in one of the biggest environmental cases in years because of a local activist's blog entry that portrays her as a 'fly on the wall' in the jury room during deliberations."
"Questions raised about judge's fairness":
Yesterday's edition of The Galveston County Daily News contained an article
that begins, "Since U.S. District Judge Samuel B. Kent has been accused of -- and apparently sanctioned for -- sexual harassment, some people are wondering how he can preside over such cases himself. One particular decision, dating from 2002 and involving a complaint filed by a former employee of the Galveston County Sheriff's Office, might be a case in point."
And the newspaper's publisher, Dolph Tillotson, had an op-ed entitled "Kent should resign" that begins, "Federal District Judge Samuel B. Kent should resign his post, or the U.S. House of Representatives should begin an impeachment inquiry. That is a judgment not offered lightly, and it is based on the belief that the appearance of justice in Judge Kent's court is damaged beyond repair."
"Ethics complaint filed against Texas appeals judge; Execution would not have taken place if court had stayed open after 5 p.m., 19 lawyers claim":
Chuck Lindell has this article
today in The Austin American-Statesman.
The Houston Chronicle reports today that "Lawyers say judge violated executed man's rights."
And The San Antonio Express-News reports that "Judge is under fire after execution."
"L.A., homeless advocates reach deal on sidewalk sleeping; The homeless can sleep on L.A. streets from 9 p.m. to 6 a.m. with certain restrictions": This article
appears today in The Los Angeles Times.
And The New York Times reports today that "Los Angeles to Permit Sleeping on Sidewalks."
"Judge allows California cities to ban cat declawing":
Today in The San Francisco Chronicle, Bob Egelko has an article
that begins, "The state Supreme Court allowed cities in California to ban cat declawing Wednesday, rejecting veterinarians' challenge to a West Hollywood ordinance that could lead to copycat measures elsewhere."
"Case of Texas Murderer Engrosses Supreme Court":
Linda Greenhouse has this article
today in The New York Times.
Today in The Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports that "Chief Justice Prolongs Executive Powers Debate." The newspaper also contains an editorial entitled "The Law of the Land: Does an American or international court get to say what it is?"
David G. Savage of The Los Angeles Times reports that "High court cool to Bush claim on death cases."
Joan Biskupic of USA Today reports that "Death row dispute puts Bush at odds with Texas; State resists order to review Mexican's case."
In The Houston Chronicle, Patty Reinert reports that "Texas fights at Supreme Court in death row case; Solicitor general argues that the World Court and the president don't trump state law in Mexican inmates controversy."
In The Dallas Morning News, Todd J. Gillman reports that "Supreme Court hears debate on scope of president's power in court affairs; Justices must decide if he had power to demand review sought by tribunal."
And The Fort Worth Star-Telegram reports that "Bush administration, Texas square off over treaty."
"Five Years Ago: No amount of time can erase the horror of the sniper shootings." This editorial
appears today in The Washington Post.
"Supreme Court nominee wins praise; Kaine's pick for high court called 'Va. success story'":
The Richmond Times-Dispatch today contains an article
that begins, "Gov. Timothy M. Kaine said 'the enormous talent pool on the bench' in Virginia gave him plenty of choices for a Supreme Court appointment. He picked Chesapeake Circuit Judge S. Bernard Goodwyn. Kaine announced Goodwyn's Virginia Supreme Court appointment yesterday morning."
The Virginian-Pilot reports today that "Kaine appoints Chesapeake judge to Virginia Supreme Court."
And The Washington Post reports that "Kaine Appoints Chesapeake Judge to Supreme Court."
"House Panels Vote for More Scrutiny Over Foreign Eavesdropping": This article
appears today in The New York Times.
The Washington Post reports today that "White House Fights Democratic Changes to Surveillance Act."
And The Los Angeles Times reports that "House panels pass spy restrictions; Democrats advance legislation hours after Bush denounces it as weakening a terrorism-fighting tool."
"Attorney General Nominee Made His Name With Terror Cases":
The Washington Post today contains a front page article
that begins, "Early in the Bush administration, Michael B. Mukasey's position at the intersection of terrorism and the justice system may have cost him a promotion. Mukasey, then chief judge of the main federal court in New York City, caught the eye of the White House for elevation to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit."
"Home Court Advantage":
Today in The New York Times, Law Professor Michael J. Broyde
and Deborah E. Lipstadt have an op-ed
that begins, "Thanks to the Internet, universal access to the printed word and economic globalization, the 21st century is expected to be shaped by the free exchange of ideas. But casting a shadow over this optimistic prediction is the emerging threat of 'libel tourism.'"
"Schools Stymie Justices; Deadlock Over New York Case":
Joseph Goldstein has this article
today in The New York Sun.
Today in The Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports that "Court Is Split, Won't Hear Special-Education Case."
And The New York Times reports that "Supreme Court Upholds Tuition Ruling."
"The United States Attorneys Scandal Comes to Mississippi":
Adam Cohen has this Editorial Observer essay
today in The New York Times.
The New York Times today contains an editorial
that begins, "The Supreme Court exerts leadership over the nation's justice system, not just through its rulings, but also by its choice of cases -- the ones it agrees to hear and the ones it declines."
And The Los Angeles Times today contains an editorial entitled "The human cost of secrecy: Even if the Supreme Court turned away a torture victim's case, El-Masri deserves an apology and compensation" along with an op-ed by Rosa Brooks entitled "Too much cloak and swagger: When the White House plays 'I've Got a Secret,' who is being protected?"
"School Integration Efforts Face Renewed Opposition; Supreme Court Ruling Sways Milton Battle; Off to Private School": This front page article
appears today in The Wall Street Journal.
"Innocence testing on back burner; $8M targeted for DNA appeals gathering dust":
Richard Willing has this front page article
today in USA Today.
"Bush Faces an End-of-Term Slowdown on Appellate-Court Nominees":
James Rowley of Bloomberg News provides a report
that begins, "President George W. Bush wants to fill 15 U.S. appeals-court vacancies before he leaves office in January 2009. The Democratic-controlled Senate is likely to approve fewer than half that number. Which nominees make it will largely depend on their political connections, and luck."