<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <title>How Appealing</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://howappealing.law.com/" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://howappealing.law.com/atom.xml" />
    <id>tag:howappealing.law.com,2008-04-16:/1</id>
    <updated>2013-05-25T00:56:39Z</updated>
    
    <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type Pro 4.38</generator>

<entry>
    <title>&quot;The Supreme Court Must Stop The Trial Lawyers&apos; War On Innovation&quot;</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://howappealing.law.com/052413.html#051178" />
    <id>tag:howappealing.law.com,2013://1.51178</id>

    <published>2013-05-25T00:56:40Z</published>
    <updated>2013-05-25T00:56:39Z</updated>

    <summary>&quot;The Supreme Court Must Stop The Trial Lawyers&apos; War On Innovation&quot;: Theodore H. Frank has this essay at Forbes.com....</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Howard Bashman</name>
        
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://howappealing.law.com/">
        <![CDATA[<strong>"The Supreme Court Must Stop The Trial Lawyers' War On Innovation":</strong> Theodore H. Frank has <a href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/realspin/2013/05/24/the-supreme-court-must-stop-the-trial-lawyers-war-on-innovation/">this essay</a> at Forbes.com.]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>&quot;Diabetes in California schools: State&apos;s high court to hear legal battle over insulin shots.&quot;</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://howappealing.law.com/052413.html#051177" />
    <id>tag:howappealing.law.com,2013://1.51177</id>

    <published>2013-05-25T00:36:29Z</published>
    <updated>2013-05-25T00:36:47Z</updated>

    <summary>&quot;Diabetes in California schools: State&apos;s high court to hear legal battle over insulin shots.&quot; Howard Mintz of The San Jose Mercury News has this update....</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Howard Bashman</name>
        
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://howappealing.law.com/">
        <![CDATA[<strong>"Diabetes in California schools: State's high court to hear legal battle over insulin shots."</strong> Howard Mintz of The San Jose Mercury News has <a href="http://www.mercurynews.com/breaking-news/ci_23319104/diabetes-california-schools-states-high-court-hear-legal">this update</a>.]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>&quot;In Fourth Circuit, a Spotlight on Warrantless GPS Tracking&quot;</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://howappealing.law.com/052413.html#051176" />
    <id>tag:howappealing.law.com,2013://1.51176</id>

    <published>2013-05-24T20:00:16Z</published>
    <updated>2013-05-24T20:00:21Z</updated>

    <summary>&quot;In Fourth Circuit, a Spotlight on Warrantless GPS Tracking&quot;: Mike Scarcella has this post today at &quot;The BLT: The Blog of Legal Times.&quot;...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Howard Bashman</name>
        
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://howappealing.law.com/">
        <![CDATA[<strong>"In Fourth Circuit, a Spotlight on Warrantless GPS Tracking":</strong> Mike Scarcella has <a href="http://legaltimes.typepad.com/blt/2013/05/in-fourth-circuit-a-spotlight-on-warrantless-gps-tracking.html">this post</a> today at "The BLT: The Blog of Legal Times."]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>&quot;U.S. Chief Justice returns to LaPorte school for commencement address&quot;</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://howappealing.law.com/052413.html#051175" />
    <id>tag:howappealing.law.com,2013://1.51175</id>

    <published>2013-05-24T19:55:21Z</published>
    <updated>2013-05-24T20:38:54Z</updated>

    <summary>&quot;U.S. Chief Justice returns to LaPorte school for commencement address&quot;: The Post-Tribune of Gary, Indiana has this news update. The Times of Northwest Indiana has a news update headlined &quot;Chief Justice Roberts encourages grads at LaPorte County alma mater.&quot; And...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Howard Bashman</name>
        
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://howappealing.law.com/">
        <![CDATA[<strong>"U.S. Chief Justice returns to LaPorte school for commencement address":</strong> The Post-Tribune of Gary, Indiana has <a href="http://posttrib.suntimes.com/news/lake/20316573-418/us-chief-justice-returns-to-laporte-school-for-commencement-address.html">this news update</a>.

<p>The Times of Northwest Indiana has a news update headlined "<a href="http://www.nwitimes.com/news/local/laporte/michigan-city/chief-justice-roberts-encourages-grads-at-laporte-county-alma-mater/article_4db903e3-6529-52d6-8b58-6af3ef7009f8.html">Chief Justice Roberts encourages grads at LaPorte County alma mater</a>."

<p>And The Associated Press reports that "<a href="http://www.therepublic.com/view/story/b1608b8fec7b4a4494f6ae881a101e01/IN--Roberts-Indiana">Chief Justice Roberts tells graduates at his N. Indiana alma mater that persistence is key</a>."]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>&quot;Judges may &apos;cut and paste&apos; when writing their judgments: Supreme Court.&quot;</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://howappealing.law.com/052413.html#051174" />
    <id>tag:howappealing.law.com,2013://1.51174</id>

    <published>2013-05-24T19:51:03Z</published>
    <updated>2013-05-24T19:51:09Z</updated>

    <summary>&quot;Judges may &apos;cut and paste&apos; when writing their judgments: Supreme Court.&quot; Kirk Makin of The Toronto Globe and Mail has a news update that begins, &quot;Judges can incorporate material they didn&apos;t write into their judgments provided they apply themselves diligently...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Howard Bashman</name>
        
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://howappealing.law.com/">
        <![CDATA[<strong>"Judges may 'cut and paste' when writing their judgments: Supreme Court."</strong> Kirk Makin of The Toronto Globe and Mail has <a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/judges-may-cut-and-paste-in-their-judgments-supreme-court/article12126185/">a news update</a> that begins, "Judges can incorporate material they didn't write into their judgments provided they apply themselves diligently to the issues in the case, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled this morning."

<p>The Vancouver Sun has a news update headlined "<a href="http://www.vancouversun.com/health/Supreme+Court+with+judge+copied+side+submissions+ruling/8430439/story.html">Supreme Court OK with B.C. judge who copied one side's submissions in ruling</a>."

<p>Canadian Press reports that "<a href="http://news.nationalpost.com/2013/05/24/supreme-court-of-canada-ok-with-judge-who-copied-ruling-from-plaintiffs-written-submissions/">Supreme Court of Canada OK with judge who copied ruling from plaintiff's written submissions</a>."

<p>And CBC News reports that "<a href="http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/story/2013/05/24/bc-plagiarized-lawsuit.html">Top court reinstates $4M award in plagiarizing-judge suit; B.C. judge hearing medical lawsuit copied parts of ruling from plaintiff submission</a>."

<p>You can acces today's ruling of the <a href="http://www.scc-csc.gc.ca/">Supreme Court of Canada</a> at <a href="http://scc.lexum.org/decisia-scc-csc/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/13072/index.do">this link</a>.]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>&quot;The 6th Circuit splits with 2nd and 9th, lowers bar for securities claims&quot;</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://howappealing.law.com/052413.html#051173" />
    <id>tag:howappealing.law.com,2013://1.51173</id>

    <published>2013-05-24T19:42:47Z</published>
    <updated>2013-05-24T19:41:15Z</updated>

    <summary>&quot;The 6th Circuit splits with 2nd and 9th, lowers bar for securities claims&quot;: Alison Frankel&apos;s &quot;On the Case&quot; from Thomson Reuters News &amp; Insight has this report....</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Howard Bashman</name>
        
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://howappealing.law.com/">
        <![CDATA[<strong>"The 6th Circuit splits with 2nd and 9th, lowers bar for securities claims":</strong> Alison Frankel's "On the Case" from Thomson Reuters News & Insight has <a href="http://newsandinsight.thomsonreuters.com/Legal/News/ViewNews.aspx?id=78484">this report</a>.]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>&quot;Scalia vs. Roberts: The conservative justices faced off over Obamacare -- now they&apos;re dueling again.&quot;</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://howappealing.law.com/052413.html#051172" />
    <id>tag:howappealing.law.com,2013://1.51172</id>

    <published>2013-05-24T19:33:35Z</published>
    <updated>2013-05-24T19:33:28Z</updated>

    <summary>&quot;Scalia vs. Roberts: The conservative justices faced off over Obamacare -- now they&apos;re dueling again.&quot; Tom Donnelly and Doug Kendall have this jurisprudence essay online at Slate....</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Howard Bashman</name>
        
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://howappealing.law.com/">
        <![CDATA[<strong>"Scalia vs. Roberts: The conservative justices faced off over Obamacare -- now they're dueling again."</strong> Tom Donnelly and Doug Kendall have <a href="http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2013/05/scalia_vs_roberts_conservatives_face_off_on_the_supreme_court.html">this jurisprudence essay</a> online at Slate.]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>&quot;Argument Audio: The Four Holdout Circuits.&quot;</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://howappealing.law.com/052413.html#051171" />
    <id>tag:howappealing.law.com,2013://1.51171</id>

    <published>2013-05-24T18:33:05Z</published>
    <updated>2013-05-24T18:32:04Z</updated>

    <summary>&quot;Argument Audio: The Four Holdout Circuits.&quot; Michelle Olsen has this post today at her blog, &quot;Appellate Daily.&quot;...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Howard Bashman</name>
        
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://howappealing.law.com/">
        <![CDATA[<strong>"Argument Audio: The Four Holdout Circuits."</strong> Michelle Olsen has <a href="http://appellatedaily.blogspot.com/2013/05/argument-audio-four-holdout-circuits.html">this post</a> today at her blog, "Appellate Daily."]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>&quot;Appeals court upholds Ciavarella&apos;s 28-year sentence&quot;</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://howappealing.law.com/052413.html#051170" />
    <id>tag:howappealing.law.com,2013://1.51170</id>

    <published>2013-05-24T17:25:23Z</published>
    <updated>2013-05-24T18:29:08Z</updated>

    <summary>&quot;Appeals court upholds Ciavarella&apos;s 28-year sentence&quot;: The Citizens&apos; Voice of Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania has a news update that begins, &quot;A federal appeals court Friday upheld the conviction and 28-year prison sentence for disgraced former Luzerne County Judge Mark A. Ciavarella Jr.&quot;...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Howard Bashman</name>
        
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://howappealing.law.com/">
        <![CDATA[<strong>"Appeals court upholds Ciavarella's 28-year sentence":</strong> The Citizens' Voice of Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania has <a href="http://citizensvoice.com/news/appeals-court-upholds-ciavarella-s-28-year-sentence-1.1494941">a news update</a> that begins, "A federal appeals court Friday upheld the conviction and 28-year prison sentence for disgraced former Luzerne County Judge Mark A. Ciavarella Jr."

<p>You can access today's ruling of the <a href="http://www.ca3.uscourts.gov">U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit</a> at <a href="http://www.ca3.uscourts.gov/opinarch/113277p.pdf">this link</a>.]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>&quot;Court hears &apos;sensitive jobs&apos; fight&quot;</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://howappealing.law.com/052413.html#051169" />
    <id>tag:howappealing.law.com,2013://1.51169</id>

    <published>2013-05-24T17:10:06Z</published>
    <updated>2013-05-24T17:12:01Z</updated>

    <summary>&quot;Court hears &apos;sensitive jobs&apos; fight&quot;: Josh Gerstein of Politico.com has this blog post reporting on a case reargued en banc today at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. You can access the oral argument audio via this...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Howard Bashman</name>
        
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://howappealing.law.com/">
        <![CDATA[<strong>"Court hears 'sensitive jobs' fight":</strong> Josh Gerstein of Politico.com has <a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/under-the-radar/2013/05/court-hears-sensitive-jobs-fight-164752.html">this blog post</a> reporting on a case reargued en banc today at the <a href="http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov">U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit</a>.

<p>You can access the oral argument audio <a href="http://oralarguments.cafc.uscourts.gov/default.aspx?fl=2011-3207_5242013.mp3">via this link</a> (14.3 MB mp3 audio file). And you can access the original three-judge panel's ruling in the case <a href="http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/images/stories/opinions-orders/11-3207.pdf">at this link</a>.]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>&quot;Appeals court hears arguments in Wilmington public housing gun case&quot;</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://howappealing.law.com/052413.html#051168" />
    <id>tag:howappealing.law.com,2013://1.51168</id>

    <published>2013-05-24T16:16:13Z</published>
    <updated>2013-05-24T16:16:39Z</updated>

    <summary>&quot;Appeals court hears arguments in Wilmington public housing gun case&quot;: Sean O&apos;Sullivan of The News Journal of Wilmington, Delaware has a report that begins, &quot;Having lost a federal court battle over restricting guns in Wilmington&apos;s public housing, plaintiffs backed by...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Howard Bashman</name>
        
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://howappealing.law.com/">
        <![CDATA[<strong>"Appeals court hears arguments in Wilmington public housing gun case":</strong> Sean O'Sullivan of The News Journal of Wilmington, Delaware has <a href="http://www.delawareonline.com/article/20130523/NEWS01/305230071/Appeals-court-hears-arguments-Wilmington-public-housing-gun-case">a report</a> that begins, "Having lost a federal court battle over restricting guns in Wilmington's public housing, plaintiffs backed by the National Rifle Association asked an appeals court [yesterday] morning to send the matter back to Delaware courts."

<p>You can access <a href="http://www.ca3.uscourts.gov/oralargument/audio/12-3433Jane%20Doe,%20etal%20Vs.%20Wilmington%20Housing%20Authority,%20et%20al.wma">at this link</a> (18.2 MB Windows Media audio file) the audio of yesterday's oral argument before a three-judge panel of the <a href="http://www.ca3.uscourts.gov">U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit</a>.]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>&quot;Supreme Court&apos;s Ruling in Arlington v. FCC Highlights Debate Over the Meaning and Future of Chevron Deference Doctrine in Administrative Law&quot;</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://howappealing.law.com/052413.html#051167" />
    <id>tag:howappealing.law.com,2013://1.51167</id>

    <published>2013-05-24T13:10:33Z</published>
    <updated>2013-05-24T13:10:44Z</updated>

    <summary>&quot;Supreme Court&apos;s Ruling in Arlington v. FCC Highlights Debate Over the Meaning and Future of Chevron Deference Doctrine in Administrative Law&quot;: Law professor Vikram David Amar has this essay today at Justia.com&apos;s Verdict....</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Howard Bashman</name>
        
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://howappealing.law.com/">
        <![CDATA[<strong>"Supreme Court's Ruling in Arlington v. FCC Highlights Debate Over the Meaning and Future of Chevron Deference Doctrine in Administrative Law":</strong> Law professor <a href="http://www.law.ucdavis.edu/faculty/amar/">Vikram David Amar</a> has <a href="http://verdict.justia.com/2013/05/24/supreme-courts-ruling-in-arlington-v-fcc-highlights">this essay</a> today at Justia.com's Verdict.]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>&quot;Obama wades back into debates over drones, Guantanamo Bay&quot;</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://howappealing.law.com/052413.html#051166" />
    <id>tag:howappealing.law.com,2013://1.51166</id>

    <published>2013-05-24T13:04:58Z</published>
    <updated>2013-05-24T13:04:58Z</updated>

    <summary>&quot;Obama wades back into debates over drones, Guantanamo Bay&quot;: Josh Gerstein and Jennifer Epstein of Politico.com have this report....</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Howard Bashman</name>
        
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://howappealing.law.com/">
        <![CDATA[<strong>"Obama wades back into debates over drones, Guantanamo Bay":</strong> Josh Gerstein and Jennifer Epstein of Politico.com have <a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2013/05/obama-terror-drones-91831.html">this report</a>.]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>&quot;Court hears Hobby Lobby&apos;s challenge to part of health-care law&quot;</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://howappealing.law.com/052313.html#051165" />
    <id>tag:howappealing.law.com,2013://1.51165</id>

    <published>2013-05-24T00:36:47Z</published>
    <updated>2013-05-24T00:37:22Z</updated>

    <summary>&quot;Court hears Hobby Lobby&apos;s challenge to part of health-care law&quot;: The Denver Post has this news update. The Oklahoman has a news update headlined &quot;Hobby Lobby argues case before federal judges; Attorneys for the Oklahoma City retailer restate its claim...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Howard Bashman</name>
        
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://howappealing.law.com/">
        <![CDATA[<strong>"Court hears Hobby Lobby's challenge to part of health-care law":</strong> The Denver Post has <a href="http://www.denverpost.com/breakingnews/ci_23310911/court-hears-hobby-lobbys-challenge-part-health-care">this news update</a>.

<p>The Oklahoman has a news update headlined "<a href="http://newsok.com/hobby-lobby-argues-case-before-federal-judges/article/3833627">Hobby Lobby argues case before federal judges; Attorneys for the Oklahoma City retailer restate its claim that the religious beliefs of the firm's owners are violated by a federal requirement that the company provide insurance coverage for emergency contraceptives</a>."

<p>And The Associated Press reports that "<a href="http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_HOBBY_LOBBY_BIRTH_CONTROL?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT">Hobby Lobby tests birth-control coverage mandate</a>."]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>&quot;Senate Confirms a Judge, but Rancor Remains&quot;</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://howappealing.law.com/052313.html#051164" />
    <id>tag:howappealing.law.com,2013://1.51164</id>

    <published>2013-05-24T00:24:37Z</published>
    <updated>2013-05-24T00:32:33Z</updated>

    <summary>&quot;Senate Confirms a Judge, but Rancor Remains&quot;: This article will appear in Friday&apos;s edition of The New York Times. The Washington Post reports that &quot;Sri Srinivasan confirmed to serve on influential U.S. appeals court for D.C. Circuit.&quot; The Washington Times...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Howard Bashman</name>
        
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://howappealing.law.com/">
        <![CDATA[<strong>"Senate Confirms a Judge, but Rancor Remains":</strong> <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/24/us/politics/senate-confirmation-srinivasan-pritzker.html">This article</a> will appear in Friday's edition of The New York Times.

<p>The Washington Post reports that "<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/sri-srinivasan-confirmed-to-serve-on-influential-us-appeals-court-for-dc-circuit/2013/05/23/63946c32-c3e4-11e2-8c3b-0b5e9247e8ca_story.html">Sri Srinivasan confirmed to serve on influential U.S. appeals court for D.C. Circuit</a>."

<p>The Washington Times reports that "<a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/may/23/senate-confirms-first-obama-nominee-appeals-court-/">Senate confirms first Obama nominee for appeals court in D.C.</a>"

<p>And David G. Savage of The Los Angeles Times reports that "<a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-pn-senate-obama-dc-circuit-court-20130523,0,4263284.story">Senate confirms Obama's first D.C. Circuit Court nominee</a>."]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

</feed>
